 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:29:03 -0600 |
| MIME-version: |
1.0 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-disposition: |
inline |
| Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Absolutely!
Deborah Chester
Professor
Professional Writing
Gaylord College of Journalism & Mass Communication
University of Oklahoma
Norman, OK 73019-2051
Ph: (405) 325-4192
[log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: Krystal Traywick <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, March 2, 2005 10:36 am
Subject: Re: Ray Bradbury
> I'm a little behind on the whole Dante vs. Beowulf
> thread, but it's my opinion that while yes, the
> Beowulf-brand entertaining writing can be formulaic,
> that doesn't mean that it can't connect with the
> reader and give that person an inspirational moment or
> a empathic link with the author. The way I figure it,
> the formula is just the starting point, and where the
> writer goes from there makes the story, good or bad,
> Beowulf-ish or Dante-like. If a book makes you laugh
> or cry or think, it's a good book, no matter what
> shelf Borders puts it on.
>
> Krystal
>
|
|
|
