I think his taking the gun is less a plate than his leaving it--people just tend to take useful things from their dead enemies it seems. Of course, this kind of depends on what kind of gun it is, the character of the hero, etc., but in general I'd say if he takes it, it's less expected for it to come up again.
As for disposing of it, there's always the possibility of it getting knocked over a cliff by someone with more martial arts skill than the hero can handle... Very bland, yes, but I'm not familiar enough with the story to offer anything else.
Good luck!
Michael Wilkinson

On Mar 24, 2010, at 8:38 AM, Meghan Barnes wrote:

> Question, dear writer friends:
>  
> I'm editing a sci-fi fantasty. There is a battle between the hero and villain, and the hero wins. The villain dies. The hero leaves to go back to his camp without the gun, also leaving the dead body.
>  
> When I read, I wasn't so convinced the villain was dead (and really don't think he should be, but that's another story), so I told him the hero should take the gun.
>  
> Here's the question.
>  
> Is his leaving the gun more of a plate than his taking it? (If he leaves it, does it have to come up again?)
>  
> Or is his taking the gun more of a plate than his leaving it? (If he takes it, does it have to come up again?)
>  
> How do we dispose of this gun best if it's not going to come up again (even though it should, but again, another story).
>  
> Thank you for your second, third, and fourth opinions.
>  
> MB