CERVANTES-L Archives

Coloquio Cervantes

CERVANTES-L@LISTS.OU.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Lauer, A Robert" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lauer, A Robert
Date:
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:49:45 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
From: Imperiale, Louis [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2010 5:31 PM
To: Lauer, A Robert
Cc: schottw
Subject: FW: Autoría del Lazarillo

Mi buen amigo Roberto,
Imagínate que entre mis estudiantes se encuentra el Sr. William Schott.  Bill me hizo notar que uno de sus "antepasados" por lo menos en la homonimia del patrónimo, André Schott, a la zaga de Valère André, en 1608 había aludido y confirmado la autoría del Lazarillo.  André Schott estipulaba que don Diego Hurtado de Mendoza era el auténtico padre espiritual de Lazarillo.  Creo yo que este buen padre jesuita se encontraba en mejores condiciones existenciales que nosotros para afirmar y emitir semejante noticia.  Los estudiosos siguen buscando al autor de Lázaro González Pérez sin resultado concreto.   Llegamos más de 400 años más tarde para confirmar lo que se había dicho entonces.
¿Estamos descubriendo el Mediterráneo?
Saludos y recuerdos,

Louis Imperiale
Professor of Spanish
University of Missouri-Kansas City
Kansas City, MO 64110


________________________________

From: schottw
Sent: Sun 3/14/2010 3:17 PM
To: Imperiale, Louis
Subject: Autoría del Lazarillo


Louis,
Como se puede leer en varios documentos, uno de mis "antepasados ilustres," y supuestamente soltero por ser jesuita, ya se había percatado en el S. XVII de la verdadera autoría de Hurtado de Mendoza:


"The identity of the anonymous author of Lazarillo has been a puzzle for nearly four hundred years. Given the subversive nature of Lazarillo and its open criticism of the Catholic Church, it is likely that the author chose to remain anonymous out of fear of religious persecution.

We know neither the author nor the date and place of the first appearance of the work. It appeared anonymously; and no author's name was accredited to it until 1605, when the Hieronymite monk José de Sigüenza named as its author Fray Juan de Ortega. Two years later (1607) it was accredited by the Belgian Valère André to Diego Hurtado de Mendoza (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diego_Hurtado_de_Mendoza_(poet_and_diplomat). In 1608 André Schott repeated this assertion, although less categorically. ...

Documents recently discovered by the Spanish paleographer Mercedes Agulló reinforce the hypothesis (of Schott, et alia, note from your eponymous student) that the author was Diego Hurtado de Mendoza.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2