New issue of Scan <http://scan.net.au/scan/index.php>
available now
Vol. 3 no. 1 June 2006
News and the Net:
Convergences and Divergences
Edited by Chris Atton and Graham
Meikle
This special issue of Scan starts from the claim that a thorough
engagement
with news remains central to an understanding of contemporary
media. In the
1980s leading scholars could write that news was Œhigh-statusı
(Fiske 1987:
281) and that it enjoyed Œa privileged and prestigious position
in our
cultureıs hierarchy of valuesı (Hartley 1982: 5). But in the
early
twenty-first century, as Graeme Turner suggests, the very idea of
news
Œlooks increasingly old-fashionedı (2005: 13).
And yet this
picture is a complicated one, with the traditional news media
still far from
being replaced by newer models. Anyone involved in media
education will
recognise that undergraduate students commonly say that they
donıt read the
papers or watch the TV bulletins, but rather go online for
news. Pressed for
details, though, this often turns out to mean they go to
the websites of the
main newspapers or TV news providers. Some say they
prefer participatory news
networks such as Indymedia or the experience of
blogging to that of consuming
news: but here again the agenda for discussion
is often that set by the
traditional news media. Others are happier with the
blend of news and
entertainment and satirical commentary offered by TV shows
such as Have I Got
News For You? in the UK, The Glass House in Australia, or
Jon Stewartıs The
Daily Show in the US (and beyond, with episodes widely
shared online through
applications such as Bit Torrent). And yet here again,
the content of these
shows ‹ the menu of topics available to satirise ‹ is
often largely set by
the current concerns of the traditional news media.
By contrast,
practices of Œcitizen journalismı emphasise participatory media
production
that contests the concentration of media power institutionally
and
professionally, and challenge the mass mediaıs apparent monopoly on
the
production of symbolic forms (Atton 2003; Couldry and Curran 2003).
Citizen
journalism constructs a reality that directly opposes the conventions
and
representations of the mass media. To link the practice of
citizen
journalism with the practice of citizenship might then be seen as an
attempt
to offset the Œdemocratic deficitı and to counter the growing lack
of
interest in political life. The creation of alternative media
spaces
therefore becomes an important element in the development of what
Pippa
Norris (1999) terms Œcritical citizens.ı
The mainstream media
are beginning to take account of such activities. UK
newspaper the
Guardian has re-branded its online op-ed page as a blog titled
ŒComment Is
Freeı (Œ... but facts are sacredı as their former editor C.P.
Scott had
it), with some columns now attracting hundreds of follow-up posts
from
readers. The International Herald Tribune has signed a deal with the
Korean
participatory news website OhmyNews, whereby stories written by
its
non-professional citizen journalists could be carried on the
Herald
Tribuneıs website, and perhaps in the newspaper itself. These
practices
suggest new forms of reporting, such as that termed
Œprofessional
participatory storytellingı (Deuze 2005). They could be
seen as
realisations of the Internetıs democratic potential for wider
participation
in relation to news. Or they could be seen as part of processes
of
absorption and normalisation of the Net, with the established news
media
extending their influence and reach into the online environment,
thus
consolidating their positions.
This suggests two related
conceptual positions: first, the notion of news as
the outcome of
professionalised practices and the challenges its
institutionalisation faces
through participation and connectivity; second,
the struggles over symbolic
power that new media practices have instigated.
At stake here is media power,
understood institutionally and symbolically.
The papers collected in this
issue help us chart this emerging territory.
The authors share a concern with
developing new methodological approaches.
They offer work which is
empirically-informed as well as
theoretically-grounded. From one perspective,
these papers can be seen to
engage with aspects of convergence, from
multi-platform publishing to
concentrated ownership ‹ the comings-together of
content, communications and
computing; of industries and audiences; of models
and modes (Boczkowski
2004; Castells 2000; Pool 1983; Rice 1999). From
another perspective, these
essays are concerned with the opposites of
convergence, with ways in which
Net use can enable new configurations of news
production, distribution and
reception; new modes of authorship and
audiencehood; new kinds of producer
and consumer: pluralisation,
multiplication, fragmentation ‹ divergence
(Atton 2004; Bruns 2005; Lovink
2002; Meikle 2002).
Axel Bruns <http://scan.net.au/scan/journal/display.php?journal_id=69>
offers
a measured analysis of the Wikinews project, suggesting that the
early
evidence points to something of a missed opportunity. Bruns assesses
Wikinews
against some of the best available criteria for evaluating
participatory news
websites (including his own concept of Œgatewatchingı),
and in the process
provides a concise overview of the key characteristics of
the most innovative
online news projects, such as Slashdot and Indymedia.
Greg Elmer, Zach
Devereaux and David Skinner
<http://scan.net.au/scan/journal/display.php?journal_id=72>
apply some
experimental software tools and research methods to the automated
Google
News portal. Uncovering the extent to which large commercial news
providers
are highly ranked in Google News searches, and the degree to which
such news
is re-purposed newspaper content, the authorsı conclusion points to
an
extension of the reach and influence of the established news media in
the
online environment.
Lee Salter <http://scan.net.au/scan/journal/display.php?journal_id=70>
examines
the pressures that impose limits on the kinds of participatory
media
democracy to which the Indymedia movement aspires. Salter adduces
examples
from around the world of government intervention in relation to
the
activities of Indymedia collectives, emphasising the need to consider
such
alternative Net news projects as embedded within spaces which are not
only
economically but also politically regulated.
Trish Bolton <http://scan.net.au/scan/journal/display.php?journal_id=71>
makes
the case for a political economy perspective in assessing the Netıs
capacity
to enable a more plural news environment. She notes how commercial
business
models are implicated in such much-cited examples of alternative
online
journalism as Crikey and the Webdiary forum started by Margo Kingston
during
her time at the Sydney Morning Herald. Bolton also points to the
reality that
many news blogs and alternative sites lack the resources to
generate original
reporting.
Megan Boler <http://scan.net.au/scan/journal/display.php?journal_id=73>
examines
the media event in which Jon Stewart, the host of Comedy Centralıs
The Daily
Show, appeared as a guest on CNNıs Crossfire and delivered a
damning
indictment of television journalism. Clips of Stewartıs appearance
have been
downloaded millions of times, and the event was by some measures
the
most-cited media story in the blogosphere for 2004. Boler traces the
Stewart
eventıs iteration through the blogosphere, raising questions about
the uses
of satire in news commentary, and examining some key ways in which
convergent
media forms are being used to create new spaces and networks for
political
discussion.
Taken together these papers offer a sobering corrective to
anyone still
inclined towards enthusiastic generalisations about the Netıs
potential.
Arising from this work is a concern with missed opportunities and
with the
encroachment of the established news media on the possibilities of
the Net.
References
Atton, Chris (2003) 'What is "Alternative"
Journalism?', Journalism: Theory,
Practice and Criticism, vol. 4, no. 3, pp.
267-72.
‹‹ (2004) An Alternative Internet, Edinburgh: Edinburgh
University Press.
Boczkowski, Pablo J. (2004) Digitizing the News:
Innovation in Online
Newspapers, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT
Press.
Bruns, Axel (2005) Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News
Production, New
York: Peter Lang.
Castells, Manuel (2000) The Rise of
the Network Society, (second edition),
Oxford: Blackwell.
Couldry,
Nick and Curran James (2003) (eds) Contesting Media Power:
Alternative Media
in a Networked World, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Deuze, Mark (2005)
ŒTowards professional participatory storytelling in
journalism and
advertisingı, First Monday, vol. 10, no. 7, July,
http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_7/deuze/index.html,
accessed 11
June 2006.
Fiske, John (1987) Television Culture, London:
Methuen.
Hartley, John (1982) Understanding News, London:
Methuen.
Lovink, Geert (2002) Dark Fiber: Tracking Critical Internet
Culture,
Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Meikle, Graham (2002)
Future Active: Media Activism and the Internet, New
York:
Routledge.
Norris, Pippa (1999) Critical Citizens: Global Support for
Democratic
Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pool, Ithiel
de Sola (1983) Technologies of Freedom, Cambridge,
Massachusetts: Belknap
Press of Harvard University Press.
Rice, Ronald E. (1999) ŒArtifacts and
Paradoxes in New Mediaı, New Media &
Society, vol. 1 no. 1, pp.
24-32.
Turner, Graeme (2005) Ending The Affair: The Decline of Television
Current
Affairs in Australia, Sydney: UNSW Press.
Dr Graham
Meikle
-------------------------
Lecturer, Department of
Media,
Division of Society, Culture, Media and Philosophy,
Macquarie
University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
tel: (61 2) 9850-6899
fax:
(61 2) 9850-6776
email:
<[log in to unmask]>
This message is intended for the addressee(s) only and
should not be read, copied or disclosed to anyone else outwith the University
without the permission of the sender.
It is your responsibility to ensure
that this message and any attachments are scanned for viruses or other defects.
Napier University does not accept liability for any loss
or damage which may
result from this email or any attachment, or for errors or omissions arising
after it was sent. Email is not a secure medium. Email entering the
University's system is subject to routine monitoring and filtering by the
University.