Estimados colegas cervantistas, Es un infinito placer poder anunciado el siguiente libro, el cual acaba de salir. Favor de felicitar a los apreciados colegas Vibha Maurya < <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask] > e Ignacio Arellano < <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask] >. * Vibha Maurya e Ignacio Arellano, eds. Cervantes and Don Quixote. Proceedings of the Delhi Conference on Miguel de Cervantes. Hyderabad, India: EMESCO Books, 2008. x + 464 pp. ISBN: 978-81-906698-0-1. Rs. 390.- INR / $15.- USD. Internet: < <http://emescobooks.com/>http://emescobooks.com/ >. Como podrán ver (favor de observar abajo), este libro es único por al menos tres razones: 1) Presenta las actas del primer <http://faculty-staff.ou.edu/L/A-Robert.R.Lauer-1/India2005.html>Congreso Internacional sobre Don Quijote celebrado en la India (en Delhi); 2) Presenta trabajos dedicados exclusivamente al Quijote (e incluso casi exclusivamente sobre la Primera parte); 3) Presenta ensayos de un profundo calibre profesional teórico y cultural ("cutting-edge research," como se diría en inglés). En caso de que haya problemas al navegar (rara metáfora) o examinar los contenidos de la página electrónica de EMESCO Books (la cual aparece en hindú), incluyo aquí la dirección geográfica y electrónica de la casa editorial en Hiderabad (la cual aparece también en el adjunto en .pdf incluido aquí): EMESCO Books EMESCO House, 1-2-7, Bhanu Colony Gagan Mahal Road, Domalaguda, Hyderabad - 500 029, INDIA E-mail: <<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]> Preface. Vibha Maurya e Ignacio Arellano. i-vi. REFLECTIONS ON DON QUIXOTE: * Sambudha Sen. “Don Quixote and the Problem of Fiction Making.” 3-15. * Giuseppe Grilli and Hilaire Kallendorf. “‘Half the Work is in a Good Start’: The Quixote of 1605 and Its Inventio.” 16-24. * Vibha Maurya. “Don Quixote and the Theory of the Polyphonic Novel.” 25-40. * Santiago López Navia. “Relevance of the Marginal and Irrelevance of the Explicit in the Game of the Transmission of History in Don Quixote.” 41-64. CONTEXTUALISING DON QUIXOTE: * Ignacio Arellano. “Quixote’s Insanity and Sancho Panza’s Wisdom.” 67-89. * Joseph V. Ricapito. “Cervantes and Consciousness: The Christian and Muslim Worlds Juxtaposed.” 90-106. * A. Robert Lauer. “Descendit ad inferna. Don Quixote’s Descent into Hell and the Name-of-the-Father.” 107-122. * Carlos Mata. “The Two Sonnets about the Loss of La Goleta (Don Quixote, I, 40), in the Context of the ‘Tale of the Captive Captain.’” 123-146. * Susnigdha Dey. “Don Quixote and Its Author in the Context of the Moorish Question.” 147-159. THEMATICS IN DON QUIXOTE: * Jorge Aladro. “A Study of Melancholy in Don Quixote.” 163-179. * Maria Augusta de Vieira. “Discretion and Pretence in the Episode of the Dukes.” 180-194. * Fernando Plata Praga. “On Love and Occasion: A Reading of the ‘Tale of Inappropriate Curiosity.’” 195-210. * Celsa Carmen García Valdés. “Life and Literature: Tolerance in Cervantes’ Works.” 211-229. * Minni Sawhney. “War and Soldiers in Don Quixote.” 230-240. * Park Chul. “Home Remedies in Don Quixote.” 241-261. RECEPTION OF DON QUIXOTE: * Abhai Maurya. “Don Quixote a Voyage a la Columbus (A Perception Based on Russian Sources).” 265-282. * Vijaya Venkataraman. “A Critique of Reading/Writing: From Don Quixote to I the Supreme.” 283-298. * José Montero Reguera. “About a Portrayal of Cervantes by Azorín.” 299-306. * Francisco Javier Díez de Revenga. “Poetry and Myth: Reception of Don Quixote in the Poetry of the Silver Age.” 307-336. * Víctor García Ruiz. “Don Quixote, Unamuno and Gaston Baty, All United by Dulcinea.” 337-347. * Maneesha Taneja. “Quixotic Images in García Márquez’s One Hundred Years of Solitude.” 348-360. * Shyama Prasad Ganguly. “Translation of Don Quixote into Indian Languages.” 361-374. VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF DON QUIXOTE: * Sonya S. Gupta. “Media Representation of Don Quixote by Manuel Gutiérrez Aragón.” 377-392. * Anand Vivek Taneja. “Lost in La Mancha: Terry Gilliam, Holy Fools, Pirates and the Mullah.” 393-414. * Rupendra Guha Majumdar. “Don Quixote and the Legacy of a Caricaturist/Artistic Discourse.” 415-448. * Indrani Mukherjee. “Teachability of Cervantes and Velázquez as Foreign Language Texts.” 449-463. Prof. A. Robert Lauer The University of Oklahoma Dept. of Modern Langs., Lits., & Ling. 780 Van Vleet Oval, Kaufman Hall, Room 206 Norman, Oklahoma 73019-2032, USA Tel.: 405/325-5845 (office); 405/325-6181 (OU dept.); Fax: 405/325-0103 (OU dept.) Vision: Harmonious collaboration in an international world. Mission: "Visualize clearly and communicate promptly" <http://faculty-staff.ou.edu/L/A-Robert.R.Lauer-1/vita.html>VITA / <http://www.peterlang.com/all/>IBÉRICA / <http://www.ou.edu/bcom/>BCom / <http://www.ou.edu/cervantes/coloquiocervantes.html>Coloquio <http://www.ou.edu/cervantes/coloquiocervantes.html>Cervantes / <http://www.ou.edu/teatro/coloquioteatro.html>Coloquio Teatro de los Siglos de Oro