I like your suggestions. One question though-- Are contributions to
AEJMC tax-deductible? If not, perhaps contributions via a
university or charitable organization account would encourage gifts,
though the listing in the convention program (if we decide to act on the
idea in my previous e-mail) would list the name of the individual,
division, university, or organization responsible for the
contribution.
Camilla
At 04:34 PM 1/26/2009 -0600, Federico Subervi wrote:
Dear all,
I totally agree with you: Lee was a giant in both the academic and
professional sides our field.
Thus, if we can send a flower arrangement on our collective behalf, I am
sure it will be welcome by the Barrow family.
I was also in the conversation during which Lee shared the story about
the meager contribution offered by Walter Cronkite.
That is yet another reason I believe that it would be much more touching
and meaningful, that we proceed with the two things I mentioned in my
first contribution to this discussion:
1. That those who wish to do so, send a personal note to his family
indicating the value of Lee's guidance and support for our academic
success.
2. That we collectively and individually contribute to the scholarship
fund in his name. In fact, we should aim to get that fund to the
level it should be if it were adjusted for inflation, in other words, AT
LEAST $3,000. Moreover, that amount should not be just for the next
recipient or recipients of the scholarship in his name. It should
be kept and increased in the future as our funds allow.
Cordially,
Federico
On Jan 26, 2009, at 4:11 PM, Anita Fleming-Rife wrote:
That was why I asked if we could do
both--I was most bothered by the $100.00 amount. Lee Barrow was not
just an individual mentor--he was a giant--our giant--in the field of
Mass Communication. He was uncompromising and unselfish in his
quest for an inclusive field--not just the academic side but the industry
side as well. Last year, we recognized him in a session
entitled: 40 Years After the Kerner Commission Report and Lee
Barrow's Vision for a More Inclusive AEJ. Had it not been for
Lee Barrow's prescience--there's a good chance
that an inclusive AEJ would not have come to pass because it took not
only vision on Barrow's part but courage.
Last year, he shared with me a story about another giant in the
field--but on the industry side, Walter Cronkite. After Barrow
approached him on behalf of young people who needed funding for
internships, Cronkite responded several weeks later with a check for
$50. Barrow said he was shocked that someone of Cronkite's stature
and who called himself concerned about breaking barriers for black youth
would donate such a small amount--that was in the 1970s.
Federico--maybe you can calculate that adjusting for inflation--but off
the top of my head that is what $100 represents in 2009--to a man whose
life's work has touched us all.
Bradley made a suggestion, which I support. I also think that we
should discuss at the Boston meeting to give a set amount annually to the
scholarship fund even if it means raising the fees by some amount.
He was a great man and should be recognized as such.
I lift up mine eyes unto the hills from whence cometh my help. . .
.
Spam
Not
spam
Forget
previous vote
Camilla Gant, Ph.D.
Director/Associate Professor
Mass Communications
University of West Georgia
678.839.4933
Office
678.839.4926 Fax