---Apologies for cross-posting---

Dear All,
on behalf Community Radio Support Center's Coordinator, Raghu Mainali, I 
would like to inform you about the publication of the book
*
Community MHz: Assessing Community Radio Performance in Nepal. A Pilot 
Assessment of 15 Stations*
published by Community Radio Support Center (CRSC)/ Nepal Forum of 
Environmental Journalists (NEFEJ) with the support of UNESCO, Kathmandu.
*
*This book, and previous publications, can all be downloaded from CRSC's 
page at
http://www.nefej.org/en/crsc/crsc-publications.html

For further informnation, please contact directly CRSC at: [log in to unmask]

Best Regards,

Salvo

  ---------------------------------------------------------*

Executive Summary
*
1. Independent FM radio is fairly recent in Nepal. The first few radios 
were established in
the mid-1990s. Most of them were licensed and established after 2006. Until
late August 2011, the government had issued 393 licenses. The licensees 
include nongovernment
organizations (NGOs), cooperatives, local government bodies,
commercial entities and the state-run broadcaster. Nepal still lacks a 
comprehensive law
on broadcasting, despite specific guarantees for broadcasting in the Interim
Constitution 2007.

2. This document reports on the pilot assessment of 15 community radio 
stations -- or of
radios that claim to be community radios -- based on the Community Radio 
Performance
Assessment System (CR-PAS) developed by the Community Radio Support
Centre (CRSC)/ Nepal Forum of Environmental Journalists (NEFEJ). The CR-PAS
seeks to assess community radio stations in seven performance areas: 
participation and
ownership, governance, programs, resource structure and management, 
station management,
financial management and networking. It uses a set of 60 indicators and is
intended to be a practical tool that the stations could eventually adopt 
for continuous
self-assessment.

3. Following a brief overview of radio in Nepal, this report provides an 
overview of the
CR-PAS and the assessment process. Thereafter, it reports on the 
findings and analysis
both of all the radios that were assessed and also of individual 
stations, leading to
conclusions and recommendations.

4. The CR-PAS provides a basis for rating stations -- based on their 
performance scores,
from A to E. A being model radios and others between those endeavoring 
to become
community radios to those that are close to becoming model radios. None 
of the
assessed stations scored enough points to come under category A. Eight 
of the assessed
stations came under category E, three under D, two under C, and two 
under category B.
Though some of the stations under category E had obtained the minimum points
required by the CR-PAS, they did not meet the minimum requirements in 
one or more
of the seven composites or performance areas. Further, one station that 
obtained the
highest aggregate score did not obtain the minimum points required under 
one set of
indicators.

5. Among the findings, there were stations that did not produce their 
own newscasts,
those that had political and/or business interests in their boards, and 
also those that did
not have separate bank accounts. There also were stations that had 
produced much of
their own content, had independent representatives in their executive 
boards and had
begun establishing financial systems and procedures. Only three stations 
had scores that
was above the minimum required by the CR-PAS as well as the prescribed
minimum for all seven composites. There are also variations in the 
performance of the
stations across indicators. Overall, the findings provide a snapshot of 
the state of community
radio, including both the positive aspects as well as those areas that 
need to be
rectified.

6. Generally, the stations that scored well on the CR-PAS had good 
programming and
good governance systems. Radio program was a weak point for some 
stations, for
other it was resource mobilization and financial management. Though 
there were weaknesses
in terms of participation and ownership, it was attributable to lack of 
law and
policy to some extent, and not necessarily something entirely under the 
control of the
stations.

7. Even though the CR-PAS was not intended to be a rating system, the 
pilot assessment
suggests that it can be developed into one that could be of use to 
regulators and also for
stakeholders supporting the independent radio movement in Nepal. 
Further, an assessment
tool like the CR-PAS has to be a living document, one that can accommodate
improvements as radio stations also improve. Its major strength is its
acceptance by community radios. Therefore the study recommends 
continuously revisiting
the CR-PAS and refining and simplifying its indicators to prepare tools 
that can be
used to assess the performance of community radios as well as other 
broadcasters --
after fine-tuning the indicators for measuring specific issues say in 
commercial radio or
television. This assessment has provided some feedback for revising and 
updating the
indicators.

8. The findings suggest that stations that have been in operation for a 
longer period or
have narrowly defined audience groups they want to serve cannot 
necessarily perform
better unless they address to other performance areas. Further, despite 
everything that
has been said about local radio in Nepal, there was a major gap in the 
efforts of community


9. The assessment report has 14 specific recommendations relating to law 
and policy,
those addressed to donors, individual stations and CRSC/NEFEJ.

-- 
 ===========================================================================
Salvatore Scifo
 ===========================================================================
Vice-President, Community Media Forum Europe (CMFE)
E: [log in to unmask]   W: http://www.cmfe.eu
 ===========================================================================
CMFE is a network of policy experts, organizations and federations, which aim to support the role of Community Media in Europe.
Registered in Belgium as an International NGO, business n.0822992342

Supported by the EU under the 'Europe for Citizens Programma 2011'
 ===========================================================================