That's a slippery slope! 

Here is my take… You need strong, high-end leadership behind this. It's difficult to get a group of faculty in a room to discuss giving up their academic freedom for a course they like to teach their way. You also need someone like an instructional designer to be the facilitator of this conversation for the committee. It's going to be messy : )

Raleigh


On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Jean Whaley <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Greetings All,
So after doing all this research and looking forward to designing my class, we were informed by our department head that courses that are part of the core (we the community colleges have a transfer agreement with the state universities regarding these courses) will be moving toward alignment. 

So in my case, the people who are going to me teaching Music Appreciation (MUS 110) will need to agree on 75% of the course so that administrators can pull data on how well we are meeting the student learning objectives.  That means we'll be designing this course by committee.  One person in particular is resisting this process kicking and screaming.  I'm not enthusiastic about it, but right now we have three full time people teaching the course.  We're about to add another and a few adjuncts.  It will never be easier to negotiate this than now.

Advice?  Has anyone dealt with this sort of curriculum alignment?  How do you preserve maximum flexibility for the instructor while still making sure that admins can get the metrics they need?

I wish we could hire a consultant to come in and help us hash this out, but that isn't going to happen.  No budget. 
Thanks,
Jean Marie Whaley 



--
Raleigh Way
Assistant Director
Centers for Teaching and Technology
Henderson Library, Room 1303E
Phone: (912) 478-1351