like these On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Ken Oakley <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Folks, > > > > Here are my few cents worth of thoughts. > > > > · Prompt Statement tweaked: “A specific action individuals > and/or communities might take to better support those who seek to study > health and health care improvement would be to …..” > > · Cleaned up, I think the demographic sorts you have collectively > identified work fine. Remember our software limitation is eight sort > variables. > > · For this project, I think the standard rating scales would work > fine. Importance, feasibility, and relevance (to the participants’ routine > interactions with researchers). > > > > Again, just my thoughts. I don’t want to unduly bias “your” project. > > > > Ken > > > > *From:* PDQNet Core Research Team [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On > Behalf Of *Norton, Barbara L. (HSC) > *Sent:* Thursday, February 4, 2016 9:43 PM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Unfinished Concept Mapping Tasks - Top Priority > > > > Enclosed is the agenda from today’s CRT meeting with highlighting and > notes embedded (also posted to SS, line 62/63). The notes (in blue boxes) > indicate what concept mapping-related decisions we still need to make or > what information we need to quickly provide in order to get started. (Fyi, > the real minutes will get posted soon, but I knew we couldn’t wait!) > > > > The highlighting on the agenda/notes document in yellow indicate agenda > items where there are decisions to be made/info to be provided. The green > highlighting simply alerts you to some new language or suggestions within > those items. On the right hand side are blue box arrows with requests for > input, e.g. rating criteria, or information, e.g., names/emails. > > > > *I’m asking CRT members to provide their feedback on each of the > decision/request for info items by replying to this email (which will reply > to all) NO LATER THAN MONDAY AFTERNOON, FEB. 8. These items include:* > > · Further recommendations about the prompt (please review the > Guidance document too, enclosed, and see that more relevant prompt examples > have been added) > > · Recommendations on rating criteria to use > > · Recommendations on demographic variables to include > > · Confirmation of 2-5 expert team members/site by name > > · Names/emails of min. 5 PBRN reps and min. 5 academic > researchers that will do concept mapping activity (Lyndee, if you don’t > have academic researchers to do this, not to worry. Just focus on > identifying PBRN steering committee members or other clinicians in LANet.) > > > > If you can’t get everything together, get what you can! > > > > Thanks much and have a wonderful weekend, > > Barbara > > > > *Barbara L. Norton, DrPH* > Assistant Professor of Research *//* Research Division > Department of Family and Preventive Medicine *//* University of Oklahoma > Health Sciences Center > > 900 NE 10th St Room 2209 *//* Oklahoma City OK 73104 > *p * 405.271.3733 | *c * 405.308.0801 | *f * 405.271.2784 | *e * > [log in to unmask] > > > -- Lyndee Knox LA Net - A Community Health Research and Resource Network www.lanetpbrn.net and www.projectechola.org Phone: 562-434-2000