OMRF-ISG Archives

OMRF's Information Support Group

omrf-isg@SPEEDY.OUHSC.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v551)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Date:
Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:47:04 -0600
Reply-To:
OMRF's Information Support Group <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Tom's Hardware Multi-year benchmark article
From:
Quyen Arana <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
OMRF's Information Support Group <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
Sorry, about that last e-mail from me folks... thought I was replying
to Todd personally.

&$%@! technology!

Quyen

On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 03:31 PM, Todd Walker wrote:

> 65 CPUs, going back a few years, are rated:
>
>
> <http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030217/index.html>
>
> Here's a link to the actual chart created, a nice reference:
>
> <http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030217/cpu_charts-
> 32.html#comparison_table>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2