| Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) |
| Sender: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:26:01 -0600 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
http://marketwatch-cnet.com.com/2100-1002_3-5148058.html?
type=pt&part=marketwatch-cnet&tag=feed&subj=news
"To say a system is secure because no one is attacking it is very
dangerous," said Gates,
referring to operating systems that have a smaller share of the desktop
market, such
as Apple's Macintosh OS and the open-source software Linux.
But patch management continues to be the largest headache, Gates said.
"Everybody who had their
software completely up-to-date (during the epidemics) was immune to
those problems. But only 20
percent of our customers were, so obviously, we weren't doing enough."
Hmmm - My Mac OS X server has survived attacks directed at UNIX that
were successful against
various other UNIX servers around here a number of times. According to
Gates, no one is attacking it.
The last time I checked the goal of most attackers was to take over
Unix systems, not Windows
computers, because they were more useful once hijacked. The "attacks"
against OS X continue
on a regular basis, they just don't succeed.
|
|
|