SCCPLA Archives

SCCPLA - SCC Planning Committee


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Nancy Burford <[log in to unmask]>
Fri, 3 Mar 2006 17:06:20 -0600
text/plain (40 lines)
I hadn't seen it either, but I think that is because you sent it?  Lists
don't always include the sender on the distribution.    You sent it to
the NNLMSCR list right?  It's not there yet.


>>> [log in to unmask] 3/3/2006 4:57:35 PM >>>
I did sent it out earlier today-- but oddly I haven't seen it come
through yet.   If you already got it, or we see it by Monday-- I say
leave it as it is.  If not, I'll send your revised one.  In any case, 
I'll send it again in a few weeks- and then leave it to the owners of
the events to be the nags.  martha

>>> [log in to unmask] 03/03 4:46 PM >>>
Martha and Shirley,
Hopefully I'm not too late, but I made a few changes to the Sharing
Sessions part of the Call, see attached. You might not agree with them
and feel free to disregard, but I do think, if we use the new format,
need to change the title,  to emphasize that it is a new, updated,
version of the sharing sessions.
Have a good weekend,
>>> [log in to unmask] 03/02/06 12:08 PM >>>
Attached is the draft I think is ready to send out to the members- now
includes the Tech expo and all contacts.  Tim, do you want to do a
pass and send it out, or shall I?  Nancy, please do a check look over
and see if I have the dates/time correct according to the latest info.


** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any files transmitted with
it are confidential to the extent permitted by law and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If
you have received this e-mail in error please notify the originator of
the message and destroy all copies. **