OMRF-ISG Archives

OMRF's Information Support Group

omrf-isg@SPEEDY.OUHSC.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alan Shields <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
OMRF's Information Support Group <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:45:35 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 10:53:10AM -0500, Yasvir Tesiram wrote:
> Holy smoke. Didn't know you were still alive. I have no idea what
> Imaging 1 and 5 are. I don't know how transferring 500G will affect the
> rest of the network. What do you think?

Imaging1 and Imaging5 are the names of the computers as referenced in
the email. I started to say "this computer" and "that computer" and
decided to go for the names instead.

As for 500G...maxing out two ports on the Cisco switches they use around
here shouldn't interfere that much with their backplane. IIRC they have
a 3.2Gbps backplane, so they'll have left 3Gbps +/- a bit.

Besides, you guys don't seem to mind too much when I did our backups
across the Research Park <-> OMRF Main Buillding link (that's 750G). ;-)

As for me being alive...I like to have a few surprises,
Alan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2