PWA-L Archives

PWA Inside Talk

pwa-l@LISTS.OU.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"deborah a. chester" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Open discussions on the writer's craft <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:46:33 -0600
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (537 bytes) , text/html (1032 bytes)
Thou stoat!  Thou weasel!  What a sneaky thing to say, Kent!

As for Peter's question, it's considered unethical among authors to
stack reviews in this way.  Kind of like those people who charge money
for their autographs.

Deborah

Kent Graham wrote:

> Peter Gill wrote:
>
>> http://news.com.com/2100-1038_3-5159461.html?tag=nefd_top Apparently
>> people get mad when authors hype their own books? -Peter
>
> So we should be suspicious when Betrayed Kings, Gambiting Queens, and
> Singing Angels get rave reviews from 'readers in Norman'?
>
> kent graham


ATOM RSS1 RSS2