like these

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Ken Oakley <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Folks,
>
>
>
> Here are my few cents worth of thoughts.
>
>
>
> ·         Prompt Statement tweaked:  “A specific action individuals
> and/or communities might take to better support those who seek to study
> health and health care improvement would be to …..”
>
> ·         Cleaned up, I think the demographic sorts you have collectively
> identified work fine.  Remember our software limitation is eight sort
> variables.
>
> ·         For this project, I think the standard rating scales would work
> fine.  Importance, feasibility, and relevance (to the participants’ routine
> interactions with researchers).
>
>
>
> Again, just my thoughts.  I don’t want to unduly bias “your” project.
>
>
>
> Ken
>
>
>
> *From:* PDQNet Core Research Team [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On
> Behalf Of *Norton, Barbara L. (HSC)
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 4, 2016 9:43 PM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Unfinished Concept Mapping Tasks - Top Priority
>
>
>
> Enclosed is the agenda from today’s CRT meeting with highlighting and
> notes embedded (also posted to SS, line 62/63).  The notes (in blue boxes)
> indicate what concept mapping-related decisions we still need to make or
> what information we need to quickly provide in order to get started.  (Fyi,
> the real minutes will get posted soon, but I knew we couldn’t wait!)
>
>
>
> The highlighting on the agenda/notes document in yellow indicate agenda
> items where there are decisions to be made/info to be provided.  The green
> highlighting simply alerts you to some new language or suggestions within
> those items.  On the right hand side are blue box arrows with requests for
> input, e.g. rating criteria, or information, e.g., names/emails.
>
>
>
> *I’m asking CRT members to provide their feedback on each of the
> decision/request for info items by replying to this email (which will reply
> to all) NO LATER THAN MONDAY AFTERNOON, FEB. 8.  These items include:*
>
> ·         Further recommendations about the prompt (please review the
> Guidance document too, enclosed, and see that more relevant prompt examples
> have been added)
>
> ·         Recommendations on rating criteria to use
>
> ·         Recommendations on demographic variables to include
>
> ·         Confirmation of 2-5 expert team members/site by name
>
> ·         Names/emails of min. 5 PBRN reps and min. 5 academic
> researchers that will do concept mapping activity (Lyndee, if you don’t
> have academic researchers to do this, not to worry.  Just focus on
> identifying PBRN steering committee members or other clinicians in LANet.)
>
>
>
> If you can’t get everything together, get what you can!
>
>
>
> Thanks much and have a wonderful weekend,
>
> Barbara
>
>
>
> *Barbara L. Norton, DrPH*
> Assistant Professor of Research *//* Research Division
> Department of Family and Preventive Medicine *//* University of Oklahoma
> Health Sciences Center
>
> 900 NE 10th St  Room 2209 *//* Oklahoma City OK 73104
> *p * 405.271.3733   |  *c * 405.308.0801  |  *f * 405.271.2784  |  *e *
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>



-- 
Lyndee Knox
LA Net - A Community Health Research and Resource Network
www.lanetpbrn.net and www.projectechola.org
Phone: 562-434-2000