Remember there are 2 roundtable sessions. 1st session, then 1/2 hour
break, the 2nd session. So could repeat the popular sessions with the
same facilitator.
I think 11 roundtables are a good start, but who knows if they will
meet the minimum needed, that's why we need to come a list of other
popular topics to pick from in the preregistration packet. Depending on
the space, if we have 4 rooms with 2 in each room, we can have 16
sessions total. I would love for this to be highly successful, that we
would have to ask Nancy to find more space.
Tim
>>> [log in to unmask] 06/20/06 1:40 PM >>>
Well, I think you are right about Steve. Susan just tossed his name
out
without checking with him, I think, just the other day, and I hadn't
really paid any attention. I guess if the names are going to be
published I need to pay attention now. However, hopefully the topics
only will be published in the early document.
I am thinking that we will follow MLA's procedure of dropping any
topic
that doesn't get more than 3 attendees, not counting the facilitator.
If enough people choose reference we may want 2 approaches to the
topic.
Both people had offered and had slightly different ideas about it, if
I
remember correctly.
-----Original Message-----
From: SCCPLA - SCC Planning Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Deborah Halsted
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Posters - Round table topics
Shirley,
I think these look great, but have 2 comments. IMHO, I would combine
the
first 2. They seem redundant to me. Secondly, Steve Self is really
good,
but can he conduct 2 round tables at one time?
Thanks.
dh
-----Original Message-----
From: SCCPLA - SCC Planning Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Campbell, Shirley
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 12:53 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Posters - Round table topics
Sorry to be slow in response - there are 11 topics with volunteers who
are willing to lead. I think that looks like a good number for our
first year in this format. I also think it is an interesting array of
topics.
In some cases there are 2 names, so I think we can count them as
Facilitator and Recorder. I think I need to develop some type of
instructions for them. So we need to "talk" about "publishing" the
results of the conversations. I think that was part of the original
idea. Tim and I can probably take care of that, but if any of you
have
comments or ideas, I would be glad to hear them.
I told these people that I would be back with them later in the year
with some specifics, because we were working this much up at the
beginning of the year, I think.
Research 101 - What it is, types, etc - Karen Keller Research 102 - I
have an idea, now what? - Joy Harriman The changing world of reference
-
Steven Self & Margaret Peloquin Archives - how to maintain an
institution's history? - Beth Treaster Coping with and using usage
statistics - Cathy Montoya Developing programs for consumers - Karen
Vargas Scholarly publishing (open access, etc) - Mary Ryan Clinical
Decision support tools (point of care databases) - Dohn Martin Article
linkers/ URL openers - what are your options and optimum use?
Mary
Hawks?? Check with her -
knows techy side - this isn't set yet.
Interlibrary loans - New Directions of ILL (ILIAD, ISO, Odyssey) -
Dena
Plaisted Nursing - Stephen Self & Susan Bader
-----Original Message-----
From: SCCPLA - SCC Planning Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Nancy Burford
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 9:35 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Posters
Ana & Taryn mentioned an extension of the deadline (with no date
details) in the article they submitted to the SCC Connection on
Friday.
So send it out in the coming week.
Nancy
>>> [log in to unmask] >>>
If all are in agreement I will send out another call- with the
extended
deadline next week. Martha
>>> [log in to unmask] >>>
We have had 6 contributed paper abstracts so far (5 in the last 2
days).
I support extending the deadline to the end of July.
Esther
Esther Carrigan
Deputy Director
Medical Sciences Library
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX 77843-4462
[log in to unmask]
voice: 979-845-7540
fax: 979-845-7493
>>> [log in to unmask] 6/16/2006 10:07 am >>>
Hi all -
I think the end of July would give us (the LAC) plenty of time. It
just
seems to me that the earlier submission deadline was based on a
paper/mail world, where whoever the reviewers were had to have things
mailed to them and mail them back to a central point. With online
submission and email communications & attachments, you don't need to
allow that much time.
If we set the extended deadline to the end of July, say Friday the
28th,
and gave the reviewers 2 weeks to look them over (until Aug11) and get
back to people, and then we (LAC) got the final list by Aug 18th, we'd
still have plenty of time.
Those of you with more experience should speak up - and loudly - if
I'm
being way too optimistic with my timing.
The preliminary program for the registration packet is, after all,
preliminary, and doesn't have to include all the individual paper &
poster titles - just the times for the sessions. We just need things
in
time to do the final program, and make sure everything has room to
occur.
How many submissions for each activity do we have as of today?
Contributed papers?
Posters? (Vicki said 3)
Roundtables?
TechExpo?
Just remember to include the poster size in the reminder to the
deadline
extension, please!
The things we really need firmed up in order to put up the
registration
are the Roundtable Topics (if you want those available as sign-ups)
and
the Continuing Education offerings.
Again, if I'm off in my estimates of how much time we need on our end,
let me know!
Nancy
Nancy Burford
Assistant Professor
Resources Management Librarian
Medical Sciences Library
Texas A&M University
College Station, Texas 77843-4462
[log in to unmask]
979-845-1820 (voice)
979-845-7493 (fax)
----------------------------------------------------------
Attend SCC/MLA 2006 in College Station, Texas!
October 20-24, 2006
>>> [log in to unmask] 6/13/2006 7:31 am >>>
I think a lot of folks were waiting until after MLA, and then forgot.
I
have a poster to submit, but haven't yet, either.
dh
-----Original Message-----
From: SCCPLA - SCC Planning Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Campbell, Shirley
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7:19 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Posters
I am really surprised at the low number! I hope we can extend the
deadline. Send out emails begging?
-----Original Message-----
From: SCCPLA - SCC Planning Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Tim Mason
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 12:11 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Posters
With only three submissions, we need to extend the deadline and
resend
the call for papers, posters, etc. Nancy, what would be a good date to
set to allow you enough time to get the preliminary program printed?
Tim
>>> [log in to unmask] 06/12/06 12:03 PM >>>
What are your thoughts on this? What has been done in the past? We
only have three submissions to date.
Vicki
-----Original Message-----
From: Sherry White [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 11:05 AM
To: Vicki de Yampert
Subject: Posters
Vicki,
We were wondering if we are bound by the June 15 deadline for posters.
I just came up with an idea yesterday, and Craig Elam likes it. He
felt
that you would take submissions a little later, if requested.
I will see if we can do this idea. It would be a survey. I think it
is
more appropriate as a poster, rather than a contributed paper. I
wasn't
even thinking about presenting anything, but something just popped
into
my head!
Sherry
Sherry L. White, MLS
Serials Librarian
Gibson D. Lewis Library
University of North Texas Health Science Center 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd.
Fort Worth TX 76107
Phone: (817) 735-2467
[log in to unmask]
** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any files transmitted with
it
are confidential to the extent permitted by law and intended solely
for
the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you
have received this e-mail in error please notify the originator of the
message and destroy all copies. **
**********************************
Confidentiality Notice: This message, including any attachments, is
for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure
or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender by reply and destroy all copies of the
original message.
** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any files transmitted with
it
are confidential to the extent permitted by law and intended solely
for
the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you
have received this e-mail in error please notify the originator of the
message and destroy all copies. **
** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the extent permitted by law and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the originator of the message and destroy all copies. **
|
