Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 May 2003 20:29:16 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Comments: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree but we need to emphasize the fact that Blair is being used as a
reason to do away with diversity programs and give a strong statement that
we will not tolerate any position of the kind.
Felecia Jones Ross
At 07:17 PM 5/21/03 -0500, you wrote:
>I really don't see how we can have a discussion about Jayson Blair in
>a vacuum. When you consider that a white journalist was recently in
>the news for a similar problem and to think that some journalists were
>involved in the looting at the Iraqi museum--it's much bigger than Mr.
>Blair. We need to spin it that way.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Felecia Jones Ross <[log in to unmask]>
>Date: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 3:47 pm
>Subject: Blair panel
>
>> Two names immediately come to my mind for panelists for the
>> discussion about Jayson Blair. Neil Henry and George Curry. They
>> have both
>> written columns about the matter. Henry is a journalism professor
>> at U.C
>> Berkley and his column is in this week's Chronicle of Higher
>> Education.George Curry, former editor of Emerge Magazine has a
>> column that can be read
>> on trottergroup.com.
>> We might also consider putting it into a debate format and
>> includeskeptics of affirmative action, such as our friend William
>> McGowan.
>> Felecia Jones Ross
>>
>
>
>
|
|
|