Estimados colegas cervantistas,
Es un infinito placer poder anunciado el
siguiente libro, el cual acaba de salir. Favor
de felicitar a los apreciados colegas Vibha
Maurya <
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
> e Ignacio Arellano < <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask] >.
* Vibha Maurya e Ignacio Arellano,
eds. Cervantes and Don Quixote. Proceedings of
the Delhi Conference on Miguel de
Cervantes. Hyderabad, India: EMESCO Books,
2008. x + 464 pp. ISBN: 978-81-906698-0-1. Rs.
390.- INR / $15.- USD. Internet: <
<http://emescobooks.com/>http://emescobooks.com/ >.
Como podrán ver (favor de observar abajo), este
libro es único por al menos tres razones: 1)
Presenta las actas del primer
<http://faculty-staff.ou.edu/L/A-Robert.R.Lauer-1/India2005.html>Congreso
Internacional sobre Don Quijote celebrado en la
India (en Delhi); 2) Presenta trabajos dedicados
exclusivamente al Quijote (e incluso casi
exclusivamente sobre la Primera parte); 3)
Presenta ensayos de un profundo calibre
profesional teórico y cultural ("cutting-edge
research," como se diría en inglés).
En caso de que haya problemas al navegar (rara
metáfora) o examinar los contenidos de la página
electrónica de EMESCO Books (la cual aparece en
hindú), incluyo aquí la dirección geográfica y
electrónica de la casa editorial en Hiderabad (la
cual aparece también en el adjunto en .pdf incluido aquí):
EMESCO Books
EMESCO House, 1-2-7, Bhanu Colony
Gagan Mahal Road, Domalaguda,
Hyderabad - 500 029, INDIA
E-mail: <<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]>
Preface. Vibha Maurya e Ignacio Arellano. i-vi.
REFLECTIONS ON DON QUIXOTE:
* Sambudha Sen. “Don Quixote and the Problem of Fiction Making.” 3-15.
* Giuseppe Grilli and Hilaire
Kallendorf. “‘Half the Work is in a Good Start’:
The Quixote of 1605 and Its Inventio.” 16-24.
* Vibha Maurya. “Don Quixote and the Theory
of the Polyphonic Novel.” 25-40.
* Santiago López Navia. “Relevance of the
Marginal and Irrelevance of the Explicit in the
Game of the Transmission of History in Don Quixote.” 41-64.
CONTEXTUALISING DON QUIXOTE:
* Ignacio Arellano. “Quixote’s Insanity and
Sancho Panza’s Wisdom.” 67-89.
* Joseph V. Ricapito. “Cervantes and
Consciousness: The Christian and Muslim Worlds Juxtaposed.” 90-106.
* A. Robert Lauer. “Descendit ad inferna.
Don Quixote’s Descent into Hell and the Name-of-the-Father.” 107-122.
* Carlos Mata. “The Two Sonnets about the
Loss of La Goleta (Don Quixote, I, 40), in the
Context of the ‘Tale of the Captive Captain.’” 123-146.
* Susnigdha Dey. “Don Quixote and Its Author
in the Context of the Moorish Question.” 147-159.
THEMATICS IN DON QUIXOTE:
* Jorge Aladro. “A Study of Melancholy in Don Quixote.” 163-179.
* Maria Augusta de Vieira. “Discretion and
Pretence in the Episode of the Dukes.” 180-194.
* Fernando Plata Praga. “On Love and
Occasion: A Reading of the ‘Tale of Inappropriate Curiosity.’” 195-210.
* Celsa Carmen García Valdés. “Life and
Literature: Tolerance in Cervantes’ Works.” 211-229.
* Minni Sawhney. “War and Soldiers in Don Quixote.” 230-240.
* Park Chul. “Home Remedies in Don Quixote.” 241-261.
RECEPTION OF DON QUIXOTE:
* Abhai Maurya. “Don Quixote a Voyage a la
Columbus (A Perception Based on Russian Sources).” 265-282.
* Vijaya Venkataraman. “A Critique of
Reading/Writing: From Don Quixote to I the Supreme.” 283-298.
* José Montero Reguera. “About a Portrayal
of Cervantes by Azorín.” 299-306.
* Francisco Javier Díez de Revenga. “Poetry
and Myth: Reception of Don Quixote in the Poetry of the Silver Age.” 307-336.
* Víctor García Ruiz. “Don Quixote, Unamuno
and Gaston Baty, All United by Dulcinea.” 337-347.
* Maneesha Taneja. “Quixotic Images in
García Márquez’s One Hundred Years of Solitude.” 348-360.
* Shyama Prasad Ganguly. “Translation of Don
Quixote into Indian Languages.” 361-374.
VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF DON QUIXOTE:
* Sonya S. Gupta. “Media Representation of
Don Quixote by Manuel Gutiérrez Aragón.” 377-392.
* Anand Vivek Taneja. “Lost in La Mancha:
Terry Gilliam, Holy Fools, Pirates and the Mullah.” 393-414.
* Rupendra Guha Majumdar. “Don Quixote and
the Legacy of a Caricaturist/Artistic Discourse.” 415-448.
* Indrani Mukherjee. “Teachability of
Cervantes and Velázquez as Foreign Language Texts.” 449-463.
Prof. A. Robert Lauer
The University of Oklahoma
Dept. of Modern Langs., Lits., & Ling.
780 Van Vleet Oval, Kaufman Hall, Room 206
Norman, Oklahoma 73019-2032, USA
Tel.: 405/325-5845 (office); 405/325-6181 (OU
dept.); Fax: 405/325-0103 (OU dept.)
Vision: Harmonious collaboration in an international world.
Mission: "Visualize clearly and communicate promptly"
<http://faculty-staff.ou.edu/L/A-Robert.R.Lauer-1/vita.html>VITA
/ <http://www.peterlang.com/all/>IBÉRICA /
<http://www.ou.edu/bcom/>BCom /
<http://www.ou.edu/cervantes/coloquiocervantes.html>Coloquio
<http://www.ou.edu/cervantes/coloquiocervantes.html>Cervantes
/
<http://www.ou.edu/teatro/coloquioteatro.html>Coloquio
Teatro de los Siglos de Oro
|