DESIGNLEARNING-L Archives

For college professors globally, to dialogue about course design.

DESIGNLEARNING-L@LISTS.OU.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jean Whaley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jean Whaley <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:49:15 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1175 bytes) , text/html (1379 bytes)
Greetings All,
So after doing all this research and looking forward to designing my class,
we were informed by our department head that courses that are part of the
core (we the community colleges have a transfer agreement with the state
universities regarding these courses) will be moving toward alignment.

So in my case, the people who are going to me teaching Music Appreciation
(MUS 110) will need to agree on 75% of the course so that administrators
can pull data on how well we are meeting the student learning objectives.
 That means we'll be designing this course by committee.  One person in
particular is resisting this process kicking and screaming.  I'm not
enthusiastic about it, but right now we have three full time people
teaching the course.  We're about to add another and a few adjuncts.  It
will never be easier to negotiate this than now.

Advice?  Has anyone dealt with this sort of curriculum alignment?  How do
you preserve maximum flexibility for the instructor while still making sure
that admins can get the metrics they need?

I wish we could hire a consultant to come in and help us hash this out, but
that isn't going to happen.  No budget.
Thanks,
Jean Marie Whaley


ATOM RSS1 RSS2